Page 38 - Denver, CO Adaptive Reuse Program
P. 38

i.  Consider refining the standards for designated parts of
                                                  the corridor.
                                               In light of planning efforts to improve the East Colfax corridor
                                               that consider Bus Rapid Transit and future public realm im-
                                               provements on behalf of the City, the requirements for individ-
                                               ual property improvements should be adjusted accordingly. This
                                               primarily refers to the varying sidewalk width as described above.
                                               Refining these standards to reduce the amount of work placed on
                                               the applicant, when the funds are secured by the City to do the
                                               work at a later date will not only reduce the cost for the applicant
                                               but will add to a more cohesive streetscape in the future. Some of
                                               these concerns may already be addressed by the draft version of
                                               the Complete Streets Guidelines, but refining sidewalk standards is
                                               still critical for adaptive reuse applicants.

                                               ii.  Right-size required improvements to the public realm.
                                               Adaptive reuse applicants expressed concern with the require-
                                               ments to dedicate large percentages of their site to improvements
                                               to the public realm, including sidewalks. In addition to being con-
                                               cerned about losing developable land, applicants mentioned the
                                               unpredictable nature of the requirement since it often occurs with
                                               on-site assessments that vary based on the reviewer. While appli-
                                               cants have a responsibility to improve their site, especially when
                                               their project may increase infrastructure demands, requirements
                                               should be made proportional to an adaptive reuse project’s scope
                                               and costs. In the case of land dedication, a cap on the percentage
                                               of project costs that an applicant is required to dedicate to public
                                               realm should be considered. This cap is not meant to indicate that
                                               adaptive reuse projects are not responsible for contributing to the
                                               community as a whole, but is meant to incentivize adaptive reuse
                                               projects. This cap will assist adaptive reuse applicants in making
                                               their project pencil, ensuring that adaptive reuse is feasible and
                                               maintaining the unique character of the buildings along the East
                                               Colfax corridor. In addition to considering a cap on the allowable
                                               costs an adaptive reuse applicant may be required to dedicate to
                                               public realm improvements, consider focusing primarily on ad-
                                               dressing (and defining) safety and hazardous conditions, in addi-
                     “Expand the” -            tion to ADA standards.
                     need to finish this
                     thought















              34                                                                             City of Denver, CO
   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43