Page 192 - Littleton, CO Comprehensive Plan
P. 192

Fiscal Impact Analysis
                                                                                         The City of Littleton, CO



               Other general items to note are as follows:

                   ▪  We generally projected operating costs on an average basis with demand factors specific to
                       the service being modeled. Personnel costs are modeled to reflect the fact that some types of
                       positions (e.g., department directors) are fixed and would not increase regardless of growth.
                   ▪  Under the marginal cost approach, growth triggers facilities and other infrastructure needs
                       that  are  built,  acquired,  or  improved  once  a  capacity  threshold  is  reached,  resulting  in
                       “lumpier” fiscal impact results. The following exception should be noted:

                       •  The transportation capital costs projected in this analysis align with the Transportation
                          Master Plan component of the Envision Littleton Comprehensive Plan; it is assumed that
                          transportation infrastructure investments will be driven by growth in population and jobs.
                          Because population and jobs are projected to grow at a consistent rate, transportation
                          capital costs follow this same linear pattern.

                   ▪  It is assumed that capital improvements projected to serve growth are financed on a pay-go
                       basis, meaning they are cash-funded at the time the infrastructure is developed or acquired.

               LEVELS OF SERVICE

               Cost projections are based on the “snapshot approach” in which it is assumed the current level of
               service, as funded in the City’s FY2019 budget, will continue through the projection period.  Current
               demand base data was used to calculate unit costs and service level thresholds. Examples of demand
               base data include population, dwelling units, employment by industry type, and jobs. Note that the
               “snapshot” approach does not attempt to speculate about how levels of service, costs, revenues, and
               other factors will change over the planning period.  Instead, it evaluates the fiscal impact to the City
               as it currently conducts business under the present budget.

               REVENUE FUND STRUCTURE

               Revenues are projected assuming that the City’s current revenue fund structure as defined by the
               FY2019 budget will not change.


               INFLATION RATE
               The rate of inflation is assumed to be zero throughout the projection period, and cost and revenue
               projections are in constant 2019 dollars.  This assumption is in accord with current budget data and
               avoids  the  difficulty  of  forecasting  as  well  as  interpreting  results  expressed  in  inflated  dollars.  In
               general, including inflation is complicated and unpredictable.  This is particularly the case given that
               some costs, such as salaries, increase at different rates than other operating and capital costs such as
               contractual and building construction costs.  These costs, in turn, almost always increase in variation
               to the appreciation of real estate.  Using constant 2019 dollars reinforces the snapshot approach and
               avoids these problems.


                                                                                                            4
   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197