Page 14 - Breckendridge, CO Design Standards
P. 14

14
         Scenario 2a



         Information                                            Quick Facts
          • Site                                                 • Approximate lot dimensions
               » Slight upward slope in rear of lot                  » 50’x124’
          • Connector                                            • Approximate square footage of historic building
               » Medium                                              » 800sq.ft.
          • Addition                                             • Height of historic building
               » One-and-a-half story, walls even with those of historic     » 9’ to eave
              building                                               » 14’ to ridgeline
          • Parking                                              • Approximate square footage of addition:
               » Alley access rear garage                            » 1,272sq.ft. (20’x24’ +20’x24’ + 12’x26’)
          • Roof Form                                            • Dimensions of Connector
               » Front Facing Gable with side-facing dormers         » 12’x26’
                                                                 • Height of addition
                                                                     » 20’ to ridgeline
                                                                     » Half story - 6’ to eave; 10’ to ridgeline
                                                                 • Lot Size
                                                                     » 0.14 acre
                                                                 • Approximate UPA
                                                                     » 9.25

         Plan View                                        Alley  Birds Eye View









          Street








         Perspective 1                                          Perspective 2



















         Comments from SHPO
          • Overall comment: This addition is inappropriate because it’s too large, looms over the historic building and does not
            appear to be designed with the historic building in mind
          • Density and height are too high
          • Good that the side wall planes are maintained
   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19